7 Appendix Robust Uniform Persistence

Jenita Jahangir

To obtain the robust persistence result for the system of difference equation of the form

(1) x⁢(t+1)=A⁢(t,z⁢(t,ξ))⁢y⁢(t),y⁢(t+1)=f⁢(t,z⁢(t),ξ),

where z=(x,y) is the state space in ℝ+p+q and ξ∈ℝl, where l∈ℝ denotes the vector of parameters. Let F⁢(t,z⁢(t),ξ) denotes the right hand side of (1). Specifically,

F⁢(t,z⁢(t),ξ)=(f⁢(t,z,ξ),A⁢(t,z,ξ)⁢y).

Let, z⁢(t)=ϕ⁢(t+s0,s0,z0,ξ) be the non-autonomous solution semiflow generated by (1).
Let X:={(x,y)∈ℝ+p×ℝ+q|y⁢(t)=0⁢∀t>0} be the extinction set. Let P⁢(t+s0,s0,z0,ξ) is the solution matrix for the following linear system in u, where u∈ℝ+2 and P⁢(s0,s0,z0)=I,

(2) u⁢(t+1)=Ah⁢(t,z⁢(t),ξ)⁢u⁢(t).

To prove the robust uniform persistence we need the following assumptions from [salceanu2013robust]:
(H1) There exists a closed set B that absorbs all trajectories corresponding to ξ0 (i.e. ∀s0∈ℤ+,z0∈Z,∃t⁢(s0,z0) such that ϕ⁢(t+s0,s0,z0,ξ0)∈B,∀t≥t⁢(s0,z0)).
(H2) Let

U:={η∈R+q||η|=1},
M:=B∩X.

Then ∀z0∈M,η∈U,∃T>0,c>1,s0∈ℤ+ such that ∀s≥s0,∃T⁢(s)∈(0,T] satisfying

P⁢|(T⁢(s)+s,s,z0)⁢η|>c,

which is equivalent to Proposition 3.8 from [salceanu2013robust].
(H3) ∀t0∈ℤ+,z0∈M,∃K>0 such that |ϕ⁢(t+s0,s0,z0,ξ0)|≤K,∀s∈ℤ+,t∈[0,t0].
(H4) There is a neighbourhood VB~ of B and N~ξ⁢0 a bounded neighbourhood of ξ0 such that for any compact set M~⊂X, there exists a constant K>0 such that

(3) ‖A⁢(t,z0,ξ0)‖≤K,
(4) |F⁢(t,z2,ξ)−F⁢(t,z1,ξ0)|≤(|z2−z1|+|ξ−ξ0|),
(5) ‖A⁢(t,z2,ξ)−A⁢(t,z1,ξ0)‖≤K⁢(|z2−z1|+|ξ−ξ0|),

∀t∈ℤ+,z0,z1∈M~,z2∈VB~,ξ∈Nξ⁢0.
Moreover, for every neighborhood VB of B, VB⊆VB~, there exists Nξ⁢0 a neighbourhood of ξ0, Nξ⁢0⊆Nξ⁢0~, satisfying the following: ∀z0∈Z,s0∈ℤ+,ξ∈Nξ⁢0,∃t⁢(z0,s0,ξ)∈ℤ+ such that

(6) ϕ⁢(t+s0,s0,z0,ξ)∈VB,∀t≥t⁢(z0,s0,ξ).

(H5) {z=(x,y)∈B||y|≤δ} is bounded (hence compact), for some δ>0.
(D) For every z0∈M,η∈U⁢and⁢t0∈ℤ+ there exists C>0 such that |P⁢(t0+s0,s0,z0,ξ0)⁢η|≥C for all s0∈ℤ+.