An important key to working on effective meaning-making in therapeutic
or learning contexts centers on using those contexts and activities that
enhance pragmatic mapping.
* Should include discourse genres other
than just conversations
* Should focus on skills as they are
situated within event structures
* Should vary skills and activities
to fit the experiences of particular children in their
everyday contexts
* Context Embedded
Several Points concerning the Situated Contexts that are utilized:
1. Since language is a tool for making sense of something
else, the "something else" has
prominence and serve as the situated
contexts -- the activities and the contexts within
which those activities occur.
2. The contexts should be as natural and authentic as possible.
More work must occur in
real situations and on real tasks.
Teaching/Learning should involve true
interaction and discourse that
is authentic.
3. The contexts should be rich in meaning-making and organized
to provide as much
opportunity as the child can have
with a range of text types and activities.
-- Talking
-- Listening
-- Reading
-- Writing
-- Problem Solving
-- Reflecting
-- Arguing
-- Justifying
-- Drawing
-- Acting
-- Gesturing
-- Manipulating
These help focus on multisensory approaches
and different learning styles
4. The students should be immersed in appropriate mediational
support throughout
the activities.
5. The Contexts/Events chosen often act as scaffolds for the child
6. Themes, interest units, problem solving activities, and
topics or subjects relevant to
the students should be the situated
contexts of teaching/learning. Unmotivated
activities should be avoided.
7. The following considerations should be employed when
choosing the Situated
Contexts:
-- What is most relevant to the needs of the child
-- What is most salient for the child
-- What is most motivating for the child
-- How do the targeted meaning-making skills fit into the context
-- Which Contexts/Events are easiest to stage
-- What are the preferences for the parents/teachers (for collaborative
purposes)
-- The contexts typically vary according to developmental level, interests,
and
needs of the individual child.
8. You must respect the logic of experience and not interfere with it.
9. Present a preparatory set for the activity initially.
10. Material may be worked through in cycles where the depth of understanding
and range of comprehension
increases in each cycle.
11. Since academics is the primary business of schools,
the classroom context and
academic activities
should be a primary intervention target and agenda for any
school-age child.
12. The situated contexts should have authenticity and it should
have relevance to the
student.
-- Whole texts, stories, conversations and other phenomena that
occur
naturally and normally in life.
-- The language, interests, and experiences that students bring to school
should
have high value.
-- The students should have choices.
-- The Community in which the child is immersed should have a part.
13. There are number of Situated Contexts that can be utilized.
For example:
* Settings and activities that can be routinely applied to interact
effectively with
young children when working with language and meaning making
1. Interactional Formats
2. Toy Play (Symbolic)
3. Constructive Play
4. Art
5. Looking at Pictures and Books
6. Oral Learning Activities with Everyday Routines
7. Child Care Routines
8. Excursions
9. Story Telling (and acting stories out)
10. Music
* Settings and activities that can be routinely applied to interact
effectively with
older children to create the vehicles for intervention
1. Literacy activities (reading and writing)
2. Academic interventions
3. Conversational formats
4. Representational Play
5. Hobbies
6. Excursions
7. Themes
8. Problems to Solve
9. Research Activities
10. Story Enactments
11. Preparation for authentic tasks (job interviews, work)
12. Art
* There are many ways that the systematicity that is known as
narrative structure can be
strengthened.
* It must be recognized, however, that trying to teach narrative
organization
explicitly or outside of a contextual
setting is a violation of pragmatic naturalness
constraints and should not occur.
* The use of direct story grammars and the request that the child
tell or retell
narratives by making explicit
reference to story grammar structures suggests a
significant lack of understanding regarding
meaning-making and its principles.
* Narratives do offer a format to practice meaning-making in extended
discourse
and often they are advantageous formats
over conversation, for example, because they
are less open-ended and more structured.
Depending on the child, this may assist in
creating effective scaffolds.
* Narratives are also considered a transition between the "language
of conversation" and
the "language of literacy".
As such, narratives as vehicles for intervention may be
preferred when trying to
work to language for learning purposes.
* Some examples of facilitating the narrational structures via
various vehicles for
intervention:
1. Literacy Formats:
Read Alouds of
well-organized and well-motivated Literature implicitly builds
the maps referred to as narrative structure and story grammar. The
more
opportunities that children have to hear stories with strong organization
and
motivation, the more opportunity and success with such structures
Reciprocal Reading
also
provides these experiences. Additionally, the more
competent reader can summarize and mediate in such a way as to highlight
the
setting and action....and even the motivations or feelings of the characters
all
within the context of the story and in an implicit manner.
Pre-reading strategies
can
also highlight (implicitly and in context) the major
mapping functions referred to as story components or the story grammar...but
this should not be done explicitly
2. Representational Play Formats:
Exemplifying
Narrative Structures during Play can be accomplished by proving
the child with clear examples of select narrative structures during the
actual play. Whether engaging in symbolic play like going to work
or having a
tea party or using action figures to fight or explore a wilderness, explicit
demonstrations can be staged through action. The clinician can decide
which
narrative components to emphasize during play and simply makes certain
those
actions are frequently represented. For example:
* Temporally related events can be exemplified via the natural sequences
of
preparing tea and setting out the dishes......or the loading of the half-track
by
the solders or explorers who are hunting their "prey". Continual
and
contextually embedded exposure to such events will result in integration.
* Causally related events can be introduced by having events happen
that have
serious repercussions for the "actors"..... running out of tea or having
a
mechanical failure during the expedition are examples. Again, repeated
and embedded exposure acts to emphasize for integration.
* goal-directed behavior
* Plans
Engaging the Child in Direct Planning of the Play will also enhance the
narrative knowledge. That is, before the play begins, a type of
metalinguistic planning can occur where you introduce the theme and
characters, solicit the child to play, and permit the child to select a
role.
Then jointly (using appropriate mediation) make decisions about the goals.
Plans, attempts, and outcomes.
Guiding the development of the narrative during play can be accomplished
by adopting various modes or voices to impose an organized narrative-like
framework. The use of different voices (stage manager, character,
narrator)
not only can accomplish this structure in an embedded context but it also
provides the play with a structure that is layered rather than sequential
only.
These voices can be used to participate and direct the action. The
stage
manager provides direct comments about the play (Let's pretend that the
green solders are sneaking up and the blue guys can't even see them); the
narrator functions as an observer and can supply feelings, assumptions,
and
intents that frame the play's development (The captain knows he and his
men
are surrounded.....he must have a plan); while the character can supply
the
same aspects as the narrator but from a personal perspective ("I think
we are
trapped! Quick men, get in the tank.....we will bust our way out!).
In each of
these, every aspect of narratives can be woven into the fabric of the
play.......again, the continual presentation of such features will cause
integration to occur.
Supporting the child's contribution to the play in the voices that the
child
uses will also strengthen narrative structure. In such cases, all
the child's
contributions to the play should be incorporated into the play unless they
are
too repetitive, violates script knowledge or impinges on the rights of
the
other characters.
3. Story Telling and Acting out
Stories as a Format:
Allowing children to tell stories of their own choosing and then writing
them down for the children while they tell them is another excellent vehicle.
You then use the verbatim work as a "script" for a play by the child and
others (if there are more characters). This is another excellent
way to work
simplicitly on narrative structures and organizations. In telling
the story and
then getting it written down, no comments are made by the clinician.
The
child simply is allowed the creativity....but when the child and others
come
together to plan the "play" the script is scrutinized in terms of the characters
and actions and such.......now the need for the motivations and a setting
and
other elements may require more direction........usually, the other children
ask about aspects of their roles which revolve around good structure and
motivation. The "author" then gets to deal with each aspect of the
story as
it is brought up by the others. The Clinician can write down the
additions
and corrections........from the author or ask the author if he/she wants
to
incorporate the ideas that others have expressed. Only the child
who was
the author can agree to incorporate suggestions from others. The
clinician
writes down the revisions and then can summarize....but try not to guide
too
directly....let the natural consequences
take hold.......this is an excellent
way to work on the organization without explicitly referring to it........the
focus is telling a good story that makes sense to the actors and not adhering
to some external story grammar