Neuromuscular Features Affecting Speech
Strength
Speed
Range
Steadiness
Tone
Accuracy
Confirmatory signs
Signs other than the deviant speech characteristics
and
features of speech muscles during speech that
can help
confirm a speech diagnosis
Can be found in speech or nonspeech muscles
Examples of confirmatory signs within the speech system
Atrophy
Fasciculations
Emotional lability
Reduced reflexes
Presence of pathologic reflexes
Strength of cough and coup de glotte
Examples of confirmatory signs in nonspeech motor system
Gait disturbances
Abnormal muscle stretch reflexes
Limb atrophy and fasciculations
Loss of automatic movements
Difficulty initiating limb movements
Abnormalities of strength speed, accuracy,
tone, steadiness and ROM
at rest or during nonspeech
tasks
Assessment Process
History
Assessment of nonspeech function
Perceptual analysis of speech
Intelligibility assessment
Acoustic and physiologic analyses
PROTOCOL FOR EXAMINATION OF MOTOR SPEECH DISORDERS
1. History
* facts about onset
and course
* associated deficits
* patient's awareness
of the symptoms/perception of the deficit
* degree of disability or
handicap caused by the problem i.e.
consequences
of the problem
* what kinds of things
have been tried to manage the problems
* suggestions of questions
pp.68-69
2. Assessment of nonspeech function
A. cranial nerve/oral mechanism exam e.g. Dworkin-Culatta
Oral Mechanism Examination
or other commercial or non-commercial
format
trigeminal (Vth) nerve
* look for weakness, asymmetry and incoordination of thefacial (VIIth) nerve
muscles controlling jaw movement
* evaluate sequential motion rates (SMRs) using /p p p / and
/m m m /- listening for pace and rate of production, articulatory
precision, weak intensity, disintegration of rate or production and/or
uneven loudness or pitch
* also do sensory testing of facial area
* evaluate muscles controlling lip and facial movements with aglossopharyngeal (IX), vagus (X) and spinal accessory (XI)
number of nonspeech tasks
* repeat SMRs described above with bite block to restrict
contribution of jaw movement and look at lip movement in isolation
* as they apply to speech affect the integrity of pharyngeal, palatalhypoglossal (XII) nerve
and laryngeal musculature
* look for evidence of dysphagia, drooling
* examine palatal musculature at rest and during forceful phonation
of /a/ paying special attention to uvula, asymmetry of palatal
movement, fatigue on extended phonation
* evaluate resonance features with and without nasal clip,
mirror test for nasal air flow
* look for tongue atrophy, fasiculations or other abnormal involuntary movementsB. evaluate respiratory adequacy for speech
* check range, speed strength and symmetry of nonspeech tongue movements
* evaluate integrity of tongue movements for SMRs using /t t t / for tongue tip and
/k k k / for tongue back both with and without bite block
* alternating motion rates (AMRs) using /p t k /
* as with other speech testing looking for blurring of articulation,
pace or rate abnormalities, unevenness in loudness or pitch etc.
3. Perceptual analysis of speech
A. gather the following speech samples audio
and/or video tape for analysis a
* vowel prolongation
* alternating motion rates (AMR) and sequential motion rates (SMR)
using speech syllables and or words such as "puppy" "buttercup"
* standard reading passage
* narrative about pictured scene
* conversation sample
* stress test (counting for 2-4 minutes)
* complex multisyllabic words and sentences
* repeat days of week, months, CVC syllables with identical initial
and final consonants, sing familiar tune
B. identify and rate deviant speech characteristics (pg 82 text)
4. Intelligibility assessment
rate intelligibility using one of following scales
* Assessment of Intelligibility
of Dysarthric Speech
* Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment
* Word Intelligibility Test
(Kent et. al, 1989)
* Tikofsky Test of Intelligibility
* Situational Intelligibility
Survey (Berry and Sanders, 1983)
5. Acoustic and Physiologic Measures
* Perceptually based clinical
assessment will probably always be
most important component of clinical diagnosis
* As expense of instrumentation
decreases, many acoustic and physiologic measures
that have been used extensively in research have potential value for clinical
diagnosis
(and management - but we will deal with this later)
* Lack of instrumental
use clinically may also reflect a lack of knowledge on the part
of current clinicians - "phobias" about using instrumentation - or lack
of clearly demonstrated
clinical value
Examples of instrumental
measures relevant to motor speech evaluations;
Magnitude and timing of F2 movements
F2 slope
Diadochokinetic rate - average rate, variation of rate, intensity variations
during repetitions
VOT
Pitch and intensity magnitude and variations during speech and sustained
vowels
Measures of nasal resonance (Nasometer)