The following are summaries of official class
evaluations for some of the classes Dr. Korcz has taught.
PHIL 111 Contemporary Moral Dilemmas
PHIL 201 How to Think About Weird Things (formerly PHIL 210)
PHIL 322 History
of Modern Philosophy
PHIL
331 Philosophy of Religion
PHIL 361 Introduction to Symbolic Logic
PHIL
371 Paradoxes & Skepticism
Evaluations are for Fall 2019, Fall 2020, and Fall 2022. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
|
The course learning outcomes and
objectives were made clear at the beginning of the course. |
28 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
Sufficient instructions on
assignments, projects, and/or exams were clearly communicated. |
28 |
12 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
This course was challenging. |
24 |
21 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
Explained subject matter in a way
that I could understand. |
21 |
13 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
Provided prompt feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
27 |
14 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
23 |
16 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
Communicated clearly. |
26 |
14 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
Was available for scheduled
appointments. |
22 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 19 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as: |
23 |
14 |
9 |
1 |
6 |
Evaluations are for Fall 2010, Spring 2010 and
Fall 2009. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 28 |
31 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 38 | 22 | 2 |
2 | 0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 22 | 28 |
3 | 10 | 4 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 36 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 26 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 4 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 47 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 40 | 21 | 4 | 2 |
0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 35 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 39 | 22 | 2 |
1 |
2 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 41 | 19 | 3 |
4 | 0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 40 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 31 | 22 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 21 | 25 | 11 |
8 | 3 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
34 | 19 |
6 | 7 | 2 |
Evaluations are for Fall 2000, Fall 2001 and Spring 2002.
Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
4 |
37 |
9 |
3 |
PHIL 111 Contemporary Moral Dilemmas
Evaluations for Fall 2018, Spring 2018, and Fall 2016. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
33 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way I
could understand. |
25 |
17 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
27 |
17 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
Was respectful to students. |
37 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
23 |
16 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
30 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
Evaluations are for Fall 2015, Fall 2014, Fall
2013, Fall 2012, Fall 2011 and Spring 2010. Numbers refer to
number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 49 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 53 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 48 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 56 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 50 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 59 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 54 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 52 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 54 | 12 | 3 | 2 |
1 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 57 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 51 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 56 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 41 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
49 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
note:
the following question was asked only starting in Fall
2013. |
much
lighter |
lighter |
about
the same |
heavier |
much
heavier |
The
workload for this course in relation to other courses of
equal credit was: |
0 |
6 |
16 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
61 |
29 |
1 |
3 |
|
6 |
17 |
73 |
24 |
6 |
PHIL
201 How to Think About Weird Things
Evaluations are for Spring 2023. Numbers refer to number of
students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly
disagree |
||
Sufficient
instructions on assignments, projects, and/or exams were clearly communicated. |
9 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
This course
was challenging. |
8 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Provided prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests | 9 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
8 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Communicated clearly | 8 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
||
Overall, I
would rate this course as |
9 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
Overall, I
rate this instructor as |
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Evaluations for Spring 2019, Fall 2017 and Fall 2016. Numbers
refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
18 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way I
could understand. |
17 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
15 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
Was respectful to students. |
19 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
16 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
20 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
Evaluations are for Spring 2016, Fall 2014, Fall 2013, Fall 2012, Spring 2012, Fall 2010 and Fall 2009. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 50 | 19 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 57 | 12 |
4 | 1 | 1 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 46 | 21 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 49 | 14 |
10 |
3 | 1 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 45 | 14 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 57 | 10 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
This course challenged me to think. | 55 | 16 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 49 | 12 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 50 | 16 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 54 | 16 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 48 | 20 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 47 | 19 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 39 | 23 | 8 |
2 |
2 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
46 | 19 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
note: the following question was asked only starting in Fall 2013. | much
lighter |
lighter |
about
the same |
heavier |
much
heavier |
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was: | 0 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
Evaluations are for Fall 2002, Spring 2003,
Fall 2003, Fall 2004, Fall 2005, Fall 2006, Fall 2007 and Fall
2008. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
60 |
43 |
14 |
5 |
0 |
|
2 |
10 |
80 |
38 |
13 |
Evaluations are for Fall 1998, Fall 2000, Fall
2002, Fall 2004 and Fall 2006. Numbers refer to number of
students, not percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
20 |
10
|
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
6 |
25 |
17 |
5 |
Evaluations are for Spring
2023. Numbers
refer to number of students, not percentages.
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
Strongly
Disagree |
|
Sufficient
instructions on assignments, projects, and/or exams were clearly communicated. |
7 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
This course
was challenging. |
7 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Provided prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests | 8 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Provided
helpful feedback on completed projects, assignments, and
tests |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
Communicated
clearly |
9 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I
would rate this course as |
6 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Overall, I
would rate this instructor as |
8 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
Evaluations for Spring 2020 and Fall 2022. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
strongly
agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly
disagree |
|
The
course learning outcomes and objectives were made clear at the beginning of the course. |
33 |
15 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
This
course enhanced my understanding of the course subject. |
27 |
19 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
This
course was challenging. |
20 |
15 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
Explained
subject matter in a way that I could understand. |
26 |
17 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
Provided
prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
29 |
15 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
Provided
helpful feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
29 |
17 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall,
I would rate this course as |
24 |
17 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
Overall,
I rate this instructor as |
32 |
13 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
Evaluations for Fall 2019, Spring 2018, Fall 2017, Spring
2017, and Fall 2016. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
90 |
91 |
10 |
16 |
3 |
Explained subject matter in a way I
could understand. |
99 |
81 |
11 |
16 |
3 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
87 |
80 |
19 |
20 |
4 |
Was respectful to students. |
123 |
64 |
13 |
6 |
3 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
72 |
83 |
38 |
11 |
5 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
95 |
75 |
19 |
10 |
6 |
Evaluations are for Spring 2016, Fall 2015,
Spring 2015, Fall 2014, Spring 2014, Fall 2013, Spring 2013,
Fall 2012, Spring 2012, and Fall 2011. Numbers refer to number
of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 246 | 125 | 30 | 10 | 9 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 279 | 95 | 22 | 6 | 5 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 219 | 100 | 38 | 25 | 11 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 275 | 86 | 34 | 15 | 12 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 218 | 102 | 55 | 24 | 28 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 304 | 90 | 23 | 1 | 5 |
This course challenged me to think. | 261 | 93 | 37 | 19 | 12 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 230 | 75 | 35 | 3 | 2 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 276 | 70 | 23 | 2 |
3 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 287 | 95 | 23 | 12 | 4 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 259 | 108 | 36 | 7 | 9 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 246 | 106 | 44 | 7 | 14 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 151 | 141 | 53 | 19 | 17 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
224 | 119 | 36 | 21 | 14 |
note: the following question was asked only starting in Fall 2013. | much
lighter |
lighter |
about
the same |
heavier |
much
heavier |
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was: | 18 |
41 |
109 |
23 |
5 |
PHIL
322 History of Modern Philosophy
Evaluations
are for Spring 2023. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly
disagree |
|
Sufficient
instructions on assignments, projects, and/or exams were clearly communicated. |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
This course was challenging. | 7 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Provided prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests | 6 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
Provided helpful feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests | 6 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Communicated clearly | |||||
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I
would rate this course as |
6 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Overall, I
would rate this instructor as |
7 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluations for Spring 2020, Spring
2021, and Spring 2022. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The course learning outcomes and
objectives were made clear at the beginning of the course. |
21 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
This course enhanced my
understanding of the course subject. |
18 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
This course was challenging. |
14 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way
that I could understand. |
19 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
Provided
prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
18 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Provided
helpful feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
18 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
16 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
18 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
PHIL
329
Skepticism (Topics in the History of Philosophy)
Evaluations are for Fall 2003, Fall 2005, and
Fall 2008 . Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
9 |
11 |
4 |
PHIL 331 Philosophy of Religion
Evaluations for Fall 2020, Fall 2021, and Fall 2022. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The course learning outcomes and
objectives were made clear at the beginning of the course. |
15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
This course enhanced my
understanding of the course subject. |
15 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
This course was challenging. |
11 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way
that I could understand. |
12 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Provided
prompt feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
12 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Provided
helpful feedback on completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
12 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
11 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
14 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Evaluations for Fall 2019, Fall 2018, Fall 2017, and Spring
2017. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
26 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way I
could understand. |
23 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
30 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Was respectful to students. |
27 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
26 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
26 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluations are for PHIL 331/2 for Spring
2016, Spring 2015, Spring 2014, Spring 2013, Spring 2012 and
Spring 2010. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 25 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 26 | 9 | 1 |
0 | 0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 19 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 25 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 26 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 27 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 27 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
0 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 26 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 22 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 23 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 22 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
25 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Evaluations are for Fall 1999, Fall 2001,
Spring 2003, Spring 2004, Spring 2005, Spring 2006, Spring 2007,
Spring 2008 and Spring 2009. Numbers refer to number of
students, not percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
59 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
3 |
76 |
59 |
6 |
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 5 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Overall, I would rate the effectiveness of
this instructor as: |
5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PHIL 371 Paradoxes
& Skepticism
Evaluations for Spring 2018. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
7 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way
I could understand. |
5 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Was respectful to students. |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
This course was challenging. |
5 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Overall, I rate this instructor
as |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluations for Spring 2017. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree |
agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The format/design of this course
was conducive to learning. |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Explained subject matter in a way I
could understand. |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Provided helpful feedback on
completed projects, assignments, and tests. |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Was respectful to students. |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
excellent |
good |
average |
fair |
poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course
as |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Overall, I rate this instructor as |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluations are for Spring 2013 and Fall 2009.
Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluations are for Fall 2010. Numbers refer
to number of students, not percentages.
strongly agree | agree |
neutral |
disagree |
strongly disagree | |
The instructor made appropriate use of illustrations, demonstrations, examples and/or required materials. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor provided feedback on my performance within a reasonable time. | 8 | 2 | 0 |
0 | 0 |
The instructor explained subject matter in a way that I could understand. | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor created an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I learned a lot in this course. | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor spoke audibly and clearly. | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This course challenged me to think. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The instructor was available for scheduled appointments outside of class. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Expectations on assignments, projects and/or exams were clearly communicated. | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
0 |
The instructor was respectful to students. | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The physical environment (facility) was conducive to learning. | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
The course resources were useful and appropriate for learning. | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Overall, I would rate this course as: | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Overall,
I would rate the effectiveness of this instructor as: |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Evaluations are for Spring 2002, Spring 2004,
and Spring 2007. Numbers refer to number of students, not
percentages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |